Leadership

Do You Think Your Contact Centre Strategy Is Working?

by Rohit Gupta | 11th Nov 2025 | 15 mins read

Most business leaders believe their contact centre strategy is working.

Calls are answered. SLAs are met. Dashboards look green.
Yet customer complaints rise, agents leave faster than expected, and CX outcomes refuse to improve.

This raises a critical question:
Is your contact centre strategy actually working – or is it simply operationally active?

In this blog, we break down how to objectively evaluate your contact centre strategy by looking beyond speed and volume metrics, identify common failure patterns, and clarify what a truly effective contact centre strategy looks like in practice.

Assess Your Contact Centre Strategy in 5 Minutes
A practical CX Strategy Diagnostic to identify gaps across operations, quality, CSAT, people, and technology.

Why This Question Matters More Than Ever

Contact centres are no longer just support functions.

They sit at the intersection of customer experience, brand perception, cost efficiency, and revenue protection.
A weak strategy doesn’t just impact CX – it silently erodes:

  • Customer retention
  • Agent productivity
  • Operating margins
  • Leadership confidence in CX data

Yet many organisations continue to evaluate contact centres using outdated or incomplete metrics.


Why Most Contact Centre Strategies Appear to Be “Working”

The issue is rarely lack of effort.
The issue is how success is defined.

Common Evaluation Criteria (And Their Blind Spots)

Evaluation Area What Leaders Track What It Misses
Call VolumesCalls handled, tickets closedResolution quality
Cost MetricsCost per callDownstream churn & repeats
SLAsASA, AHTCustomer effort
StaffingSeats filled, shifts coveredCapability & morale
TechnologyTools deployedAdoption & impact

These metrics tell you whether the machine is running, not whether it is delivering value.


A Quick Reality Check: 5 Diagnostic Questions

Answer these honestly.
If more than two answers are unclear, your strategy needs attention.

Question What It Reveals
Do you clearly know why customers contact you? Customer intent clarity
Is first-call resolution consistent across agents? Process maturity
Do fast agents also have high CSAT? Metric balance
Are your best agents also your longest-tenured ones? Talent health
Can you predict demand spikes in advance? Workforce intelligence
Does CX data influence business decisions? Strategic integration

A contact centre without these answers is reacting – not strategizing.


Strategy vs Operations: A Critical Distinction

One of the most common problems is the confusion between operations and strategy.

Area Operational Focus Strategic Focus
StaffingFill shiftsDesign workforce
MetricsTrack speedOptimise outcomes
TechnologyDeploy toolsEnable experience
TrainingOnboardingContinuous capability
Cost ControlReduce spendImprove ROI

Operations keep the lights on.
Strategy ensures the lights are worth keeping on.


4 Repeating Failure Patterns in Contact Centre Strategies

Across industries and company sizes, the same issues surface repeatedly.

1. Cost-First Strategy

“Let’s reduce cost per call.”

What happens:

  • Aggressive AHT targets
  • Agent burnout
  • Repeat calls increase

Lower cost per call often results in higher cost per customer.

2. Tool-First Thinking

“We need a better CRM, dialer, or AI solution.”

What happens:

  • Tools underutilised
  • No behaviour change
  • CX outcomes unchanged

Technology amplifies design—it does not replace it.

3. Metrics Without Meaning

“Our SLAs are green, so we’re doing fine.”

What happens:

  • Agents optimise for metrics, not customers
  • Supervisors manage dashboards, not outcomes
  • Customers still feel unheard

Metrics should drive better decisions, not just reporting.

4. Treating Agents as Replaceable

“Attrition is normal in contact centres.”

What happens:

  • Knowledge drain
  • Rising training costs
  • Inconsistent CX

High attrition is not a people problem – it is a system design problem.


What a Working Contact Centre Strategy Actually Looks Like

A strong strategy aligns customer needs, operations, people, and technology.

Key Strategic Layers

Evaluation Area What Leaders Track What It Misses
Call VolumesCalls handled, tickets closedResolution quality
Cost MetricsCost per callDownstream churn & repeats
SLAsASA, AHTCustomer effort
StaffingSeats filled, shifts coveredCapability & morale
TechnologyTools deployedAdoption & impact

When one layer fails, the entire experience weakens.


A Practical 5-Minute Self-Assessment

Score each area honestly (1 = Weak, 5 = Strong).

Dimension Score
Customer intent clarity
Workforce planning accuracy
Resolution effectiveness
Quality & CSAT alignment
Use of CX insights in decisions

How to Interpret Your Score

Total Score Meaning
20–25 Strategy is working
12–19 Strategy exists, execution weak
Below 12 Operations exist, strategy does not

This simple exercise often reveals more than months of reporting.


The Strategic Shift Most Leaders Need to Make

From To
Contact centre as cost Contact centre as CX engine
Speed as success Resolution as success
Tools as solution Design as solution
Monitoring agents Enabling agents
Firefighting Predictive operations

This shift changes not just CX, but leadership confidence.


When Organisations Usually Seek External Support

Leaders typically ask for help when:

  • CSAT declines despite SLA compliance
  • Scaling breaks consistency
  • Attrition rises despite incentives
  • AI investments fail to show ROI

In most cases, the issue is not one missing element, but a lack of integrated design across people, process, and technology.


Final Thought

A contact centre strategy is not working
just because calls are answered and SLAs are met.

It is working only when customers trust the interaction, agents believe in the system, and leadership uses CX insight as a decision engine.

If you’re unsure whether your strategy is working, that uncertainty itself is the most valuable signal.

Assess Your Contact Centre Strategy
in 5 Minutes

A practical CX Strategy Diagnostic to identify gaps across operations, quality, CSAT, people, and technology.

Scroll to Top